Following our few days in the Cairngorms we headed over to Fort William just as the snow began to fall and the winds picked up. While the majority of the group headed off on a luxury one night expedition, I chose to stay back and gain some further leadership experience, taking the four members of the group that didn’t want to go on exped into the Mamores.
At the time of leading, decisions that were made either by me or by the group as a whole seemed to come about naturally, as the day dictated. It is only now, upon reflection, that I can see how my style of leadership changed throughout the day.
In 1939 Lewin, Lippitt and White carried out a study on Leadership styles. They concluded that there are three distinct approaches to leadership and that the most effective leaders will adopt all three as the situations affecting them change. For the majority of the path up from Achriabhach towards Lochan Coire Nam Miseach and most of the way down I was using a Democratic style of leadership. As a whole the group made decisions about the pace, when to stop for breaks and some of the route finding, but I always had the final word.
At the beginning of the last century, sociologists and psychologists were starting to look into theories of leadership. It is now widely recognised that there are 8 leadership theories. The one that relates best to Lewin, Lippitt and White’s is the Contingency Theory. This suggests that the leader must adapt the style in which they lead the group depending on situational factors. It goes on to conclude that there is no one method of leadership that will work in all situations. I certainly feel that this is true. Whether it’s changes in group dynamics, weather, route or activity, a leader must be able to provide a safe and enjoyable experience that everyone can gain something from.
References
Lewin, Lippitt and White, ‘Leadership Styles’, 1939
Woods, B, ‘Applying Psychology to Sport’, Hodder and Stoughton, 1998
No comments:
Post a Comment